|
Volume 19, Edition 2 • September 14, 2007 In this issue:
Upcoming Events
Governor Sends Technology Cash to Classrooms
Lewis and Clark Money Heading to SchoolsGovernor Blunt’s bold Lewis and Clark Discovery Initiative to provide hundreds of millions of dollars to our state’s colleges and universities without a tax increase has begun. The Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority this week began transferring $230 million to higher education institutions. The transfer of money to our students comes at the same time that a Cole County judge declined a Democrat attempt to stop the flow of money. The politically motivated lawsuit was brought by two former students of the University of Missouri-Columbia – Michael McGennis and Aaron Izadi-Moghadam. Not surprisingly, McGennis has been a paid campaign staffer for Sen. Chuck Graham, one of the most vocal critics of the funding plan. The pair had sought a temporary injunction stopping the Lewis and Clark transfer, but Judge Richard Callahan refused because the plaintiffs failed to prove that their case could succeed. New House Speaker, Leadership Team Selected
Rep. Ron Richard was selected this week as the House Speaker-elect after a vote of his caucus colleagues in the Republican-controlled chamber. Richard, of Joplin, will serve in training for the next 16 months under current House Speaker Rod Jetton and then will be officially elected by the full House in January 2009. Republicans also selected Rep. Steve Tilley of Perryville to take over as majority floor leader, the person responsible for guiding debate. Tilley replaces Tom Dempsey of St. Charles who was recently elected to the Senate. Meanwhile, Bryan Pratt of Blue Springs was selected as Speaker Pro Tem and will replace Carl Bearden, who resigned recently. In the Senate, Sen. Jack Goodman of Mount Vernon was selected assistant majority leader while Sen. Luann Ridgeway of Smithville got the nod as caucus chairman. The Missouri Republican Party would like to congratulate the Republican leadership team and look forward to great things from them in the future. State Investment Status Remains Strong
Federal Aid Sought for Flooded CommunitiesGovernor Blunt this week asked President Bush to approve a Disaster Declaration for Public Assistance for seven Missouri counties as a result of the August 19-21 severe weather and flash flooding. Blunt is requesting a Disaster Declaration for Public Assistance for seven counties: Dade, Dallas, Greene, Laclede, Lawrence, Polk and Webster. Additional jurisdictions may be requested as affected counties identify storm related damages. The request for a Disaster Declaration for Public Assistance is based on reports from preliminary damage assessments conducted by joint federal, state and local teams. The teams identified over $12.6 million in damages to public infrastructure in the seven counties. If the President approves Blunt’s request, Public Assistance will reimburse jurisdictions for their eligible emergency protective actions, repairs, or replacement of damaged infrastructure, and debris clearance. “I am grateful for the assistance we have received from the federal government in the past and hope that the President quickly approves my request for Public Assistance so that funds can be made available to local jurisdictions to begin recovering from the most recent flooding,” Governor Blunt said. Governor Remembers 9/11 Tragedy
Top 11 Reasons Why Nixon Wants Contributions ReturnedWith Jay Nixon’s hypocritical and self-serving statements on the return of unlimited campaign contributions, the Missouri Republican Party this week presented the Top 11 reasons why Nixon supports giving the money back: 11. Because the media will report he is returning them even though he has not returned a penny. 10. Disbarment less likely if MEC backs the position he inaccurately represented as theirs. 9. Scoreboard dummy - he's losing. 8. Tricky Nixon’s former top aide Chuck Hatfield saves face if the over-the-limit contributions he gave to Nixon are returned since Hatfield was representing the plaintiff who clamed those contributions were illegal. 7. He's not the sharpest knife; he's getting confused about what his position is each new day. 6. He was for contributions limits before he accepted over-the-limit contributions he now wants to return them but only if others do it first. 5. Nixon more likely to generate support if contributors don't have to suffer the embarrassment of being publicly disclosed as a Nixon donor. 4. He was only able to generate one $100,000 contribution leading him to conclude that he's against "special interest contributions" (a.k.a. Adopt whatever position is politically expedient). 3. Because he can make a phony announcement without holding a news conference and no one can ask him any questions. 2. Governor Blunt has to pay to get his message out whereas Nixon just sits back and allows the liberal media do his dirty work and tell his lies for him. 1. Ameren money laundering, extortion of the targets of his investigation scheme much easier to execute under the old campaign finance system. Nixon Launches Campaign of Hypocrisy
Nixon Hides from Sunshine Law on Ethics Panel ScandalDespite self-serving claims that he supports openness in government, Jay Nixon is refusing to honor a Sunshine Law request to shed light on his claims that he represented the Missouri Ethics Commission before the Missouri Supreme Court even though he was never authorized to do so. Even though Missouri Ethics Commission members and the panel’s executive director have said Nixon was never approved to be the group’s lawyer in a case on campaign contribution limits, Nixon is claiming attorney-client privilege in refusing to honor the Missouri Republican Party Sunshine request. The Missouri Republican Party’s September 4 Sunshine Law request sought detailed records of Nixon’s alleged role on behalf of the Ethics Commission, but Nixon’s office responded by providing routine court filings, emails, and a refusal to release further information because: “Documents that reflect communications between the Missouri Ethics Commission and this office constitute attorney-client communications.” Even more ominous is Nixon’s claim that: “There are additional documents that may be responsive but are closed under Section 610.021 (1).” Nixon was never authorized by the Ethics Commission to act as their attorney before the Missouri Supreme Court; therefore, there is no attorney-client privilege, and that is why Nixon should turn these records over immediately so Missourians can understand the true nature of his role in this case. Nixon’s legal double talk shouldn’t be allowed to hide the facts from the people of Missouri and the media. The MRP request and Nixon response can be viewed at http://www.mogop.org/media/trout_sunshine.pdf Nixon Abandons Missourians on MEC ViolationsJay Nixon this week announced that he is once again abandoning his job as the state’s lawyer. This time, Nixon is refusing to pursue flagrant Sunshine Law violations by the Missouri Ethics Commission. Nixon told the Springfield News-Leader that he’s concerned that the Ethics Commission recently violated the Sunshine Law and has suggested that the local prosecutor handle the case because of his recent recusal from representing the Ethics Commission. However, Nixon had no such concerns a few weeks ago when he represented the commission before the Missouri Supreme Court on a position that would benefit him politically: the return of unlimited campaign contributions. Nixon’s Sunshine Law position did not impress the News-Leader’s Tony Messenger, a longtime defender of openness in state government, who disagreed with Nixon’s excuse because “Sunshine Law can and should be prosecuted no matter how the MEC rules ...” Nixon has again demonstrated that he performs his constitutional duties when it benefits him politically but refuses to do so when it doesn’t, it’s as simple as that.” He says he’s a champion of the Sunshine Law but his actions prove differently. Nixon created this campaign finance mess by tanking the state’s defense of unlimited campaign contributions and then opposing them before the state’s highest court. It's also understandable that Nixon is arguing for contributions to be returned since he likely has his committees all lined up to funnel money back to his campaign like he did with nearly $20,000 in illegally funneled contributions from Ameren. McCaskill Falls to Hillary’s Pressure, Returns Hsu CashDays after arrogantly defending $20,000 in donations she received from associates of disgraced Democrat contributor Norman Hsu, Claire McCaskill this week fell to pressure from Hillary Clinton and scrutiny from Missouri Republicans by agreeing to return the tainted cash. After Clinton returned more than $850,000 in Hsu contributions, McCaskill suddenly decided to return her money “as the cloud of suspicion has grown surrounding contributions from people connected to Hsu,” The Associated Press reported. The sudden change in McCaskill comes four days after she told The AP she would not return the money: “I received no money from Norman Hsu. I will always return or donate to charity any money my campaign receives that has been shown to be illegal or from people with criminal allegations or history,” she said. McCaskill’s ridiculous and untruthful excuse for why she is finally giving this money back is an insult to Missourians because these contributions were as dirty last week when she was vigorously defending them as they are this week when her political soul mate Hillary Clinton pressured her to return them. McCaskill is a follower, not a leader, and she proved that point loud and clear. McCaskill’s contributions came from people linked to Hsu including the family of William Paw of Daly City, CA. Paw, a San Francisco mail carrier, and his family live in a modest home that Hsu once listed as belonging to him. The FBI is currently investigating Hsu and his associates in connection with the donations to McCaskill, Clinton and other senior Democrats. Star Joins Disgraceful Democrats by Mocking Patriotism
AP Downplays McCaskill’s Stunning Donor AdmissionAssociated Press Washington regional reporter Sam Hananel showed once again why he is the most biased reporter when it comes to Claire McCaskill. After being pushed and prodded by the MRP to write about McCaskill’s refusal to return contributions from disgraced Democrat donor Norman Hsu, Hananel let her off the hook when she suddenly wanted to return them. Hananel even refused to use an MRP press statement about McCaskill’s change of heart. Instead, he included this in the last paragraph of the story: “The Missouri Republican Party had called on McCaskill to return the contributions from the Paws and other Hsu associates.” One would expect more from an AP reporter based in Washington, but Republicans have become accustomed to this kind of biased reporting from Hananel. To read Hananel’s entire “I Love Claire” story, visit: http://www.semissourian.com/story/1253128.html. Hananel can be reached at SHananel@ap.org or you can call The AP bureau in Kansas City at 1-800-852-4844 and ask for news editor Chris Clark. SE Missourian Applauds Governor on ImmigrationGovernor Blunt’s continued crack down on illegal immigration is receiving national and statewide praise, even from some in the media, including the Southeast Missourian. While Jay Nixon cannot run from his support of providing state benefits to illegal immigrants, the governor is standing with the majority of Missourians who believe illegal activity should not be rewarded. Click here to read the entire Southeast Missourian editorial. If you want to let the Southeast Missourian know how you feel on the issue, go to http://www.semissourian.com/opinion/letters/submit/. MissouriPulse.com Post of the WeekNixon Ploy BackfiresBackpedaling Begins Immediately After His Stunt is ExposedThe AP has a mind-blowing article regarding Attorney General Jay Nixon’s incoherent position on the campaign contribution limits. In a clumsy attempt to grandstand on the campaign finance issue, Nixon's campaign said, in effect, "We're giving back our over-the-limit contributions. No, wait, we MIGHT give them back. Well, maybe we might if everyone else does, too." From the article: Nixon campaign spokesman Oren Shur declined to say whether Nixon would wait to refund contributions until he could be assured that Blunt would do likewise. Self-serving. Hypocritical. Manipulative. Desperate. Nixon’s move is either a combination of these things or yet another classic bone-headed political move by his inept campaign. Nixon has clearly been playing both sides of the issue from the outset, and the article has exposed three glaring contradictions:
The Cornerstone - MRP Offers Training Opportunities
Thoughts and Prayers
Paul Busiek, husband of Mavis Busiek. Paul’s health concerns continue. Mike Keathley, Commissioner of Administration, who has cancer. Rosemary Kochner, 13th District State Committeewoman, who has continued health concerns. State Rep. Scott Lipke, 157th House District, whose unborn daughter has been diagnosed with a heart condition. Mary Mallien, 14th District State Committeewoman, who has continued health concerns. Dawn Sprick, daughter of 21st District State Committeeman Gary Harris, who has cancer.
Paid for by the Missouri Republican State Committee, {{user('senderaddress')}}, (573) 636-3146, Richard C. Peerson, Treasurer. This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee. |
| Sign up for the GOP Voice • Join the MRP • Get Involved |
| {{ openrate() }}Click here to unsubscribe or change preferences |